Am 07.11.2011 08:00, schrieb Sean Corfield: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Dennis Haupt <d.haup...@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> if by compatible you mean "has a specific set of functions and fields", >> then scala can do that without sacrificing static type safety: > > Yes, I started working with Scala in 2009 and it's certainly much > better than Java but it still forces you to express that sort of > commonality thru the type system.
which is a good thing. type safety is good. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
