Very hard question to answer. It makes sense that static typing would help, but in practice I never seem to get defects that are related to types. Ergo, Clojure's approach to typing works well, and the code stays very minimalist. On Nov 8, 2011 12:52 AM, "Sean Corfield" <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Dennis Haupt <d.haup...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > which is a good thing. type safety is good. > > Is it? > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ > World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ > > "Perfection is the enemy of the good." > -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
