On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Wolodja Wentland wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. What would be a good way to ensure that the > subseqeuence are lazy too?
I can't think of a good way to do this with higher-order functions, so you'll probably have to write a recursive function that "manually" iterates over the collection, looking ahead as necessary to figure out when to split. To make the result lazy, just wrap your function's body in a call to lazy-seq. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
