On Feb 27, 9:13 pm, Cedric Greevey <cgree...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Whoa, hold your horses. Aren't "Decent" and "Emacs-based" mutually-exclusive?
No, they are not. > "Novice-friendly" and "Emacs-based" definitely are. Well, if we are considering a novice in software development then you are probably right. I was particularly talking about new users of Clojure. A seasoned developer can get acquainted with Emacs pretty easily and fast. Perhaps without the hairloss you described. > Sorry, but this is probably a nonstarter... It could be, it could be not. After all I suppose the biggest part of the Clojure community still uses Emacs and I see a constant growth of reasons to it. CDT which I had not heard of until recently is a tool of a great usability improvement. This means that Emacs still matters for Clojure developers. And I don't think this is where you should apply a strict dichotomy between the hairy dudes stuck in middle ages with Emacs and all others who are used to common principles of Eclipse/ VS/etc. The usability is not 0 or 1, it is a ladder with lots of small steps. The higher you get the more users you have. However thank you for the comment, I'm still susceptible to choosing another project. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
