Clojuredocs is already out there and quite good (though not modified much as of late). However, it doesn't show up very high on Google (not even on the first page for "Clojure"). There's also Learn Clojure, which has a clean design but hasn't been updated in a while (and also doesn't seem to have a Github link, so unsure how to contribute).
It would be nice to see Clojure.org itself have a contribution process, not unlike Clojure itself. On Oct 2, 3:46 am, Yakovlev Roman <felix...@gmail.com> wrote: > You can make your site with many examples and good documentation and maybe > it will be at first place at google if it will have great value. > > A lot of people here will agree with that. Site could be better place to > get started ! but old site still there. > > As far as i know there is a company behind Scala called "TypeSafe" and they > got tons of money recently to make the lanugage more popular and attractive > to newbie users. So maybe we see good main site and good web frameworks > around Scala ( lift and play). > So maybe Clojure also need something like this. Though "Relevance" company > supports clojure somehow but i guess not enough for now. > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 1:13:49 AM UTC+4, aboy021 wrote: > > > I decided to quickly compare the website experience of starting Clojure > > and starting Scala. > > > I do a Google search for Clojure > > I decide to try the first link, Clojure.org > > There's some basic information. I follow the somewhat obscure link halfway > > down the side, "Getting Started" > > Ok, that looks promising, now I can get a REPL to interact with. > > I follow the link to the Getting Started Documentation ( > >http://dev.clojure.org/display/doc/Getting+Started) (isn't that where I > > already was?) > > Still flailing a bit, I follow the link to Mark Volkmann's Tutorial. > > This is the first chance I've had to see what Clojure actually looks like > > and how to program in it. > > > In stark contrast, I try searching for Scala. > > I get presented with an appealing, nicely laid out page with large links > > to an introduction to the language and a page on getting started. > > There are links in an easy to navigate menu with Information about the > > language, documentation, code examples, Software, and Developer information. > > > Now, I'm no Scala developer, but at first glance it seems like I've found > > a great touch stone that I can use to find out what's happening in the > > language, how it looks, what it can do for me, and I can learn how to write > > it. > > > Another thing that the scala-lang site has is Code Examples. Code examples > > are a really nice way for you to get a taste of how a language can solve > > common problems, and they can give you a real sense of the flavour of the > > language. > > > A lot of the information for Clojure seems to be there, it's just not laid > > out in an attractive easy to use format. Perhaps we could have a fundraiser > > to pay for a web designer to make a nice modern website that contains the > > information in an easier to digest and more centralised way > > > The getting started issue is an ongoing problem for Clojure. It's an issue > > that keeps coming up in the surveys and on the mailing list. Other > > languages are doing it really well, Scala is just a convenient example. > > What does the Clojure community need to do to help support the creation of > > something that is on par? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
