2013/2/4 Sergey Didenko <sergey.dide...@gmail.com> > My point is to introduce a second-class syntax to attract orthodox > users. Definitely not migrating. >
OK, I can see how I missed that point. I would say then: go ahead, transform a couple of clojure source files to that style and see, if you can lure someone orthodox out from under their rock with it. _If_ it does work, a couple of orthodox users might just be the right catalyst to make clojure greater in an even faster pace. They'll have their own syntax to play with. We'll call it "infix the reader". jk with that last part. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
