Two more things: 1) printing is often not a viable option for lazily eval-ed sequences or async processes -- the output gets jumbled! And believe me, when a new Clojure dev sees that for the first time, he/she wants to quit. 2) printing is terrible for elegant clojure code -- thing (comp f g h (partial map z)) -- in order to figure out anything about dynamic data flowing through, you have to break apart that composition or add a let binding in one of those functions before returning a value. Both of those involve a lot of friction.
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:00:13 PM UTC-7, raould wrote: > > for a long time haskell did not have a debugger. that sucked, imho. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
