Then I apologize. I must have conflated what you said with what someone else said. My mistake.
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 8:38:22 PM UTC-5, Jay Fields wrote: > > On Sunday, June 9, 2013 8:50:46 PM UTC-4, Steven Degutis wrote: > >> But that's what I meant, that he's proposing we start with his lib and >> add extensibility in the places we want it. So my response to that still >> applies. > > > That's not at all what I said, proposed, alluded to, or anything of the > sort. > > I'll use quotes, perhaps that will make things easier - though I'm > skeptical at this point. > > You said: "..were frustrated with the inflexibility of existing libs.." > > I pointed out: "..expectations* has 0 open pull requests, 0 open issues, > and is very actively maintained.." > > Further, I wanted to make sure it was clear that "..anyone who chooses to > use expectations should feel free to contact me with any suggestions.." > > That's the only thing I said. I have no desire to integrate with test2. > > I'll leave it at that. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
