2013/7/24 Ye He <htt5...@gmail.com> > Well, obviously :use can't be replaced by (require :refer).
Are you sure? require with :refer :all does exactly what :use does as far as I know. > According to DRY, I strongly agree the deprecation of :use. But that > doesn't mean interpreter shouldn't support it right now since we have > legacy code base. However, we could come to an agreement to less use of > :use. That's what "deprecate" means. -- MK http://github.com/michaelklishin http://twitter.com/michaelklishin -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
