On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Mark <markhanif...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sunday, July 28, 2013 6:52:37 AM UTC-5, Cedric Greevey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Mark <markha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Ok, then you consider Stallman's philosophy unethical since it >>> considers the philosophy of distributing close-source unethical. >> >> >> No, that would only be if he considered it unethical for someone to >> disagree with him, rather than unethical for someone to distribute closed >> source software. >> > > Stallman considers anybody that distributes closed-source software > unethical. There's no way to spin away from that fact. > And that's exactly what I said. I don't think Stallman considers "disagreeing with Stallman" to be unethical, though. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
