Ok, then you consider Stallman's philosophy unethical since it considers the philosophy of distributing close-source unethical. You should probably understand Stallman's position on other things and how he's behaved in regards to other projects (glibc, GCC, Gnome) to really understand his position. Hint, it's just as much about Stallman, as it is about any concern he has about "defending users rights".
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 4:18:08 PM UTC-5, Cedric Greevey wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Mark <markha...@gmail.com > <javascript:>>wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, July 26, 2013 2:23:33 PM UTC-5, Andy Fingerhut wrote: >>> >>> There are many who agree with Richard Stallman that it is unethical to >>> distribute software without the source code. >>> >> >> And there are many who think it's unethical to have a philosophy that >> it's unethical to distribute software without the source code. >> > > And there are many who think it's unethical to consider merely having a > philosophy to be, in and of itself, unethical ... including everyone who > signed the Bill of Rights. > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
