On Sunday, September 8, 2013 4:07:33 AM UTC-4, Steven Degutis wrote: > > https://github.com/sdegutis/clojuredocs/wiki > > {snip} > > Thoughts? > > Hi Steven,
This is a nice piece of work. Thank you. Some thoughts: * Wikis are difficult to keep nice. And, seemingly contradictory to that, it's difficult to find contributors. * There is already a Clojure wiki, <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Clojure_Programming>, but it does not see many updates. * I really like clojuredocs.org's clean (and enforced) separation of examples, see-also, and comments. * Although github's wiki feature is handy, for a pure wiki there are better solutions, IMO (for example, my favorite is [gitit](http://www.gitit.net/)). * I think some of the work necessary to replace/rewrite clojuredocs.org has already been done by dakrone. Dunno the status of it though. * I think it's worthwhile to pull docstrings directly from Clojure itself. Fixing docstring typos in a wiki is nice, but I'd rather see fixed the actual source docstrings themselves... -- John -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
