Or even better, use guava's Multiset there...

On Saturday, September 28, 2013 8:51:56 PM UTC+2, Jozef Wagner wrote:
>
> Well it should be possible to implement a foldseq variant which takes a 
> reducible collection as an input. This would speed things, as you don't 
> create so much garbage with reducers. XML parser which produces reducible 
> collection will be a bit harder :). 
>
> Anyway, I think the bottleneck in your code is at 
> https://github.com/paulbutcher/parallel-word-count/blob/master/src/wordcount/core.clj#L9Instead
>  of creating new persistent map for each word, you should use a 
> transient here.
>
> JW
>
> On Saturday, September 28, 2013 7:12:08 PM UTC+2, Paul Butcher wrote:
>>
>> On 28 Sep 2013, at 17:42, Jozef Wagner <jozef....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I mean that you should forgot about lazy sequences and sequences in 
>> general, if you want to have a cutting edge performance with reducers. 
>> Example of reducible slurp, https://gist.github.com/wagjo/6743885 , does 
>> not hold into the head.
>>
>>
>> OK - I buy that logic. But I'm unsure whether it can be applied to the 
>> case that I'm interested in.
>>
>> Firstly, I'm dealing with an XML file, so I need to parse it. Right now 
>> I'm using data.xml/parse to do so, which returns a lazy sequence. So, short 
>> of writing my own XML parser, I have to go via a lazy sequence at some 
>> point along the way?
>>
>> Secondly, the primary point of this is to exploit parallelism, not 
>> reducers per-se. So supporting CollReduce isn't enough, I also need to 
>> support CollFold. Which is exactly what foldable-seq does - I'm not sure 
>> how that differs from what you're proposing?
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> --
>> paul.butcher->msgCount++
>>
>> Snetterton, Castle Combe, Cadwell Park...
>> Who says I have a one track mind?
>>
>> http://www.paulbutcher.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbutcher
>> MSN: pa...@paulbutcher.com
>> AIM: paulrabutcher
>> Skype: paulrabutcher
>>  
>>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to