On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 5:10:43 PM UTC+2, John Hume wrote: > > The last (non-authoritative) word on cider on this mailing list[1] was > that it is unstable. Is that really the case? Is it just a matter of many > packages that depend on it not being updated? >
I'm cider's primary maintainer. My opinion is that it's very stable at the moment. More stable and less buggy than nrepl.el ever was. Most packages that used to depend on nrepl.el, now depend on cider. nrepl-ritz is only notable exception. > > I tried checking the official mailing list[2] and was surprised to find > that it's private. > That was an accidental mistake (it seems google groups are private by default). > > I'm trying to understand this because I submitted a recipe to MELPA, and > they will no longer accept packages that depend on nrepl.el. > > Thanks. > -hume. > > [1] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/clojure/cider/clojure/JfS7ZzePtA4/ZAPHHn1zS5gJ > Tim > Visher: "Also, Cider is _unstable_ at this point. I'm still using nrepl > 0.2.0 and it's working fine. I would _not_ recommend upgrading to Cider > at this point." > [2] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cider-emacs > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
