Comparing CSP and promises is apples-to-oranges.  I'd love to see a minimal 
sample of problematic code.

On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 1:39:54 PM UTC-4, Эльдар Габдуллин wrote:
>
> Each go block is executed via thread pool. On a channel side, producers 
> and consumers are also decoupled.
> Such decoupling costs around 10-20 us per async operation. For the cases 
> when your async
> values are immediately available (e.g. from cache), or when you designed 
> an async
> API just because your operations may block for a long but not necessary 
> do, those are huge numbers.
>
> For example, I recently worked on a dependency injection 
> container<https://github.com/dar-clojure/core> which 
> supports async computations.
> Asynchrony in one place means that all you API will be async everywhere. 
> Natural way to go with implementation is to just
> wrap everything in a go block. However, after doing that I found that 
> container became 50 times slower. 5 us overhead for a
> typical task turned into 250 us.
>
> As a solution I forked <https://github.com/dar-clojure/async> core.async 
> and replaced channels with lightweight promises and removed thread pool 
> dispatch from
> everywhere. Now async container implementation is only 5 times slower than 
> its sync version, which is probably acceptable.
>
> I'd like to hear what others think about this issue, especially members of 
> the core team. 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to