You've piqued my curiosity. Could I trouble you to post the benchmark results on -RC2 with 96f5b5bdc reverted?
On Friday, March 21, 2014 7:47:00 PM UTC-4, Stefan Kamphausen wrote: > > > > On Saturday, March 22, 2014 12:41:55 AM UTC+1, Andy Fingerhut wrote: >> >> That is odd. This is a shot in the dark, and probably unhelpful because >> I do not know a good way to verify whether my guess is true, but perhaps >> the seqFrom method went from being small enough to be inlined by your JIT >> before that change, to being too large to consider for inlining after the >> change? It isn't a big change in the code, so it would have to have been >> close to the threshold if this is true. >> >> > if there is anything I can do to test this, just let me know. > > Best, > stefan > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
