On 4 May 2014 20:59, Adam Saleh <adamthecam...@gmail.com> wrote: > He thought, that using the language would make it harder to avoid cache > based and timing attacks due to nature of strict/lazy sequences.
That's a good point, and one I hadn't considered. However, I can't think of any timing or cache based attack you could direct at a functional language that wouldn't also apply to an imperative one. Did your colleague have anything specific in mind? - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
