+1 to something like humane-test-output being part of core library. There is value for the community to have some foundation library share across our test frameworks? Something like `test.runners`, to encapsulate error reporting and organization? Bit crazy, I know, but the idea come after seeing Haskell's https://github.com/feuerbach/tasty. OK, I don't do Haskell, but I kind of like the way of composing a single integrated suite of different flavors of test.
Andrew On Friday, October 31, 2014 10:41:09 PM UTC-2, John Louis Del Rosario wrote: > > Would be great if humane-test-output was part of clojure.test. Would make > it easier for beginners to find it. > > On Friday, October 31, 2014 11:19:11 PM UTC+8, Eli Naeher wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Ashton Kemerling <ashtonk...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> It's my opinion that these two libraries are largely complete aside from >>> some human interface improvements (quality of output for example), but >>> clearly not everyone agrees with me. >>> >> >> Hi Ashton, >> >> Check out https://github.com/pjstadig/humane-test-output if you haven't >> already seen it, it's a nice improvement over the default output--in >> particular seeing the specific diffs between expected and actual values is >> really useful when you are dealing with collections. >> >> -Eli >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
