On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 9:58:14 AM UTC-5, Brian Marick wrote: > > > On Aug 20, 2016, at 9:03 AM, Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com> wrote: > > We discussed this before releasing the specs and decided to start on the > strict side. That said, this is still an alpha and there is plenty of time > to change our minds prior to official release of 1.9 if that ends up being > a catastrophic decision. > > > I urge you to change your minds. Whose life is harmed, and how, by > continuing to allow `require` as well as `:require`? > > The downside is that we then have to support two similar but different ways to do the same thing forever and that adds complexity.
But your feedback is noted and we'll see how things progress before we make any decisions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
