Or keep the stricter compiler and: 1. People who want to port to clojurescript will incur exactly the same cost as they do now.
**2. People who don’t want to port to clojurescript and don’t want to move to Clojure 1.9 will incur no additional cost. 3. Clojurescript maintainers will incur no additional cost. **4. COST REMOVED: Clojure maintainers will incur NO additional cost. 5. No one writing documentation will incur any cost, as what was not mentioned before will continue to be unmentioned. **6. COST REMOVED: There will be NO psychic cost because there will NOT be an undocumented inconsistency between clojure and clojurescript. **7. COST REMOVED: If, at some point, clojure and clojurescript shared code for the implementation of `ns`, neither of them would have to change how they interpret the ns form **8. BENEFIT ADDED: We benefit because an undocumented and unintended behavior went away, and one of the most confusing and complex Clojure forms becomes more consistent – we no longer have to explain to beginners that trip over (require …) mysteriously working inside ns, contrary to all the documentation out there, that “Yeah, we know (require …) works in ns, like it does outside ns, but it’s not supposed to and you shouldn’t do that – it’s a bug in Clojure”… -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
