On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 7:43:53 PM UTC-5, Colin Fleming wrote: > > I agree that the ability to get a machine-readable parse failure is very > important for tooling. However I feel very strongly that the error messages > that are printed by default on macro validation failures should be easily > understandable, and the current ones are not. If we completely punt to > tooling for this, firstly users will receive different (and different > quality) error messages depending on the tool they're using, and anyone > using plain vanilla Clojure will not get good errors at all. >
I largely agree.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
