On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 5:28:57 PM UTC-5, lvh ‌ wrote:
>
> FYI, while I disagree with your conclusion (I think we should go fix 
> libraries instead), I ran into the same issue just now for roughly the same 
> reason, except the thing that pulled in an old version of core.unify was 
> core.typed, which pulls in 0.5.3 through core.contracts. 
>

BTW, core.contracts was also updated to 0.0.6 last week to use the latest 
core.unify.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to