I went ahead and logged this here so we don't lose it: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-2076
On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 12:01:27 PM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > > > > On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 11:53:10 AM UTC-6, Tom Locke wrote: >> >> I haven't watched the keynote so I look forward to that. I sure Rich's >> arguments will convince me, as always! >> >> In my case I am spec'ing rather complex and deeply nested structures. The >> conformed values are changed all the way down. I have a bunch of functions >> to interrogate these structures in useful ways, none of which I can use in >> my specs. What would be recommended practice here? >> > > If you are mostly seeing this with s/or, then using something > s/nonconforming around ors could help you. > > >> In the slack channel someone mentioned a possible forthcoming version of >> s/and that doesn't flow conformed values through. That sounds like it might >> do the trick, and has the advantage of putting the decision with the spec >> consumer. >> > > Also something we're considering. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
