> I think using s/nonconforming with s/or will do the trick I see that’s marked ^:skip-wiki so it is (deliberately) undocumented – is that (potentially very useful) function something we can safely rely on or is that up in the air at this point?
Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood On 12/6/16, 3:37 AM, "Tom Locke" <clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of t...@tomlocke.com> wrote: > I went ahead and logged this here so we don't lose it: Thanks for that - I was intending to do so this morning but I forgot to say so in my reply. On second thought I realised that a version of s/and that doesn’t flow conformed values wouldn’t be great in function arg specs, as you could no longer do (:arg-name %) after the initial s/cat spec. I think using s/nonconforming with s/or will do the trick Thanks for you help Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
