On Tuesday 28 February 2012, Brad King wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 8:24 AM, Brad King wrote:
> > I replaced the FindPackage_ModeWarning topic on the stage with a
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > However, I'm not yet prepared to merge this to next. I'm going
> > to make more significant edits to the proposed changes and post
> > them as a separate topic and then report back here.
> 
> I pushed new topic
> 
>    find_package-improve-messages
> 
> that shares the beginning of FindPackage_ModeWarning but then
> makes slightly different changes:
> 
> - I improved detection of options that conflict with MODULE.
> CONFIG and NO_MODULE are not the only conflicts.  Other options
> imply Config mode too.
> 
> - I added a test to check the major failure case message text
> by actually comparing it to known output.  This is a stronger
> test than your FindPackageTest change and provides a reference
> for the message text of each case right in the source tree
> without running anything.
> 
> - I decided to drop the warning for MODULE or CONFIG keywords
> without a sufficiently high minimum required CMake version.
> We don't warn for other commands that have new options, and
> the project could guard the use with its own test of the
> CMake version without actually bumping the min req version
> e.g. "if(NOT ${CMAKE_VERSION} VERSION_LESS 2.8.8)".  We should
> not warn in such cases.
> 
> - I changed the warning text and documentation text of the
> CMAKE_FIND_PACKAGE_WARN_NO_MODULE variable to change the tone
> from "less ambiguous" to "more specific."
> 
> - I really don't want to ever warn in the default mode when
> falling back to Config mode.  I think the new failure message
> text and explicit mode keywords are sufficient to solve this
> problem.  Therefore CMAKE_FIND_PACKAGE_WARN_NO_MODULE will be
> required to get the warning and 2.8.8 will not warn by default.

I would prefer to warn, but it's ok.
 
> IMO this topic is ready to be merged to 'next' for testing.

Fine with me :-)

I'll delete my various findpackage-branches from stage then ?

Thanks
Alex
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to