On 10/21/2014 09:17 AM, Adam Strzelecki wrote: > First of all this is in fact Qt bug, please follow discussion at: > > > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-September/018505.html > > The patches I provided, especially 55707fd5, were intended to workaround that [snip] > I'll try build Qt4 SDK myself as you do and checkout what's the bundle layout > of theirs.
Regardless of where the bug lies, your changes took a packaging case that worked and made it not work. That is a regression. Working around it for the packaging machine of CMake itself is not a solution because it could happen to any project built this way. Please extend your changes to restore successful packaging with no special help by adding whatever workarounds are needed. If the result is not signable when the workarounds are in place that is okay because we couldn't sign before either. Thanks, -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
