On 10/20/2014 06:41 PM, Adam Strzelecki wrote: > Did you build against Qt4 SDK taken from official installer?
It's a qt 4.8.0 installed from source. configure --prefix=... -opensource -confirm-license \ -nomake demos -nomake examples -cocoa -shared -release \ -arch x86 x86_64 We also tried one with just "-arch x86_64" as part of trying to package only that architecture, but it has the same problem. > Can you put these both binaries somewhere (zipped) in the cloud? Nightly binaries are always published here: http://www.cmake.org/files/dev/ Specifically: http://www.cmake.org/files/dev/cmake-3.0.20140929-g5748a-Darwin64-universal.dmg http://www.cmake.org/files/dev/cmake-3.0.20140930-g37776-Darwin64-universal.dmg > BTW. Any reason to not use Qt5? We already have the infrastructure set up to use Qt4 and it has worked well for years. Prior to your patch the Qt5 package did not work for redistribution due to the plugin problem anyway. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
