On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 14:42:03 -0400, Brad King wrote: > On 07/08/2015 02:35 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > "Since Apple is the only vendor implementing the language > > right now, the compiler id can be just `Apple`." > > Even if another vendor implements it the one we're identifying > will still be provided by "Apple". The above wording was poor.
Or it could follow Clang and there's the FOSS swiftc and then there's AppleSwift. --Ben -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
