On 07/08/2015 03:04 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > I guess. I think part of the reason it seems wrong to me is that there is a > platform id called 'APPLE' (different case) and a variable of that name > > There is also an existing GNU platorm/compiler id (same case). > > If the same name is to be used, is there any reason not to use the same > case?
All compiler id values use CamelCase or are acronyms. The variable named "APPLE" is historical and meant to match the __APPLE__ preprocessor macro. Compiler id values are different. What do you think of Ben's "AppleSwift" suggestion? -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers