On Dec 15, 2007 3:14 PM, Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With the property stuff cmake is already becoming more OO.
To the extent that it's true, I suppose a marketing pitch could be made for CMake on that basis, to appease people who want OO. Would need a good way to display that kind of a marketing pitch. That's an infrastructural issue; the wiki is not currently a good vehicle for it. > P.S. if you would take 50% of the time you use to post here to write patches > for cmake instead, much of what you would like to have could already be > implemented Then you haven't been paying attention. There's marketing value in using standard languages. No amount of improving CMake script will ever make it noteworthy to anyone. Also, you grossly exaggerate the effort of making posts. It's nothing compared to developing and maintaining significant new CMake functionality. Cheers, Brandon Van Every _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake