On Sunday 16 December 2007, Brandon Van Every wrote: > On Dec 16, 2007 1:11 PM, Gonzalo Garramuño <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brandon Van Every wrote: > > > Waf is the offering of a fellow > > > who clearly thinks OO is important in a build system for some reason. > > > http://code.google.com/p/waf/ > > > > A quick eval of waf.... > > Ok, waf sucks. It can't demonstrate anything compelling about OO > build systems in practice. But does it say anything about OO build > systems in theory? Does the author have a good idea? > > Meanwhile I just keep expanding my search radius, asking various build > system communities "the OO question."
What's the purpose ? CMake is kind-of going OO. Alex _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
