Hi Bill, Alex, I tried getting it building using custom commands, but that seems to mean of adding an obj file as "source file" (read: being listed in the project file) that gets customly build with an assembler. Apart from being ugly, it didn't seem to work either. But in retrospect, that might be because of the same missing def file I was struggling with for the nmake build.
As Bill says, what I really would like to see is visual studio compiling the asm file where the asm file itself is considered as the source file. Bill, is this something that is planned to be worked on? Alex, your cmake files work great for the nmake build. Is it allowed to ship these files with the project that needs them (and to check them into the svn repository), as long as they are not part of the cmake distribution yet? Regards, Bram 2008/10/30 Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >> On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Bill Hoffman wrote: >> >>> Bram de Greve wrote: >>> >>>> So thumbs up for the nmake side of the story. Thanks for your help. >>>> >>>> So, now there's only the visual studio project generation left ... >>>> Can this be fixed on script level as well? Or does it need "binary >>>> intervention" ? >>>> >>> I am pretty sure, this would require C++ changes to support. >>> >> >> I thought languages beside C/C++ are supported in these generators via >> custom commands ? >> >> > They are, but it is not going to be real support, and is under tested, so I > am thinking it won't work... I would think people would want visual studio > actually compile the asm stuff like it does the c/C++. > > > -Bill > > _______________________________________________ > CMake mailing list > CMake@cmake.org > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake > -- hi, i'm a signature viruz, plz set me as your signature and help me spread :)
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
