Will Dicharry wrote:
John R. Cary wrote:
I am a real newbie here (exploring cmake) so my words should be taken
with a grain of salt. But we find (in our current autotools
setup), that it is good to have a flag that tells one whether the hdf5
was
compiled with --enable-parallel.
I agree that would be useful. I *think* HDF5 will name the wrapper
compilers h5pcc or h5pc++ (rather than h5cc) if HDF5 was compiled with
collective IO support, so I could make a guess based on that. Does
anyone see a problem with this approach?
John, how do autotools detect this?
Thanks,
-Brad
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
