On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 18:27, Michael Wild <them...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tup was already discussed on this list quite some time ago. Using > LD_PRELOAD to do those things makes my skin crawl. > Using an incorrect C preprocessor and needing to write a dependency generator for each language/dialect makes my skin crawl. :-) > I really like the concepts behind Tup, and it is blazingly fast, but > that funky hijacking business makes me really uncomfortable. OTOH, if > the author of Tup really can make it watertight, backed up by an > extensive test suite which you can apply to your toolchain in order to > be sure it works fine, I could get used to the idea ;-) > My problem with Tup is not with the dependency analysis, but with out-of-source and partial builds. A few people have been asking for these things, and while Mike Shal (Tup's author) still seems unconvinced of their importance, I expect they will show up eventually.
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
