On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Troy Straszheim <straszh...@willowgarage.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Michael Wild <them...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 2. Tcl (or other) scripting language, which has clearly defined variable >>> scoping rules and well understood semantics. >> >> There are many pros for this idea, but a very important con: People will >> use it as a general purpose programming language (see what often happens >> to SCons projects). Even CMake has this problem to a lesser extent (IMHO >> mainly because it's a PITA to program ;-)). But I think some people at >> Kitware are/were experimenting with Python bindings... >> > > Really?!? I'm actually *generating* CMakeLists.txt files with python > in an effort to work around the entire cmake language and integrate > better with things that need to know about the build, but aren't the > build system proper.
No, not really. (At least not to the best of my knowledge...) There was an experiment a few years ago using Lua, but it was shelved and has not been revisited. Nothing in python that I know of. Cheers, David > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake