On 05.10.2011 20:38, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2011, Peter Kümmel wrote:
And here some numbers to compare it with Qt's qmake.
I've used this project: http://kst-plot.kde.org/
which supports qmake and cmake.
Running make/ninja on a fresh compiled project
with warm caches (in seconds):
qmake cmake Ninja
Makefiles makefiles
-j1 0.5-0.8 1.6-1.9 0.11-0.14
-j2 0.6-0.8 1.3-1.4 0.11-0.13
-j4 0.6-0.7 1.1-1.4 0.10-0.13
Summary:
- Ninja is the fastest
- cmake Makefiles are really slow
- parallel jobs doesn't help much in this special case
and:
- qmake makefiles don't have complete dependencies
Seriously, if cmakes Makefiles are slower, I am very sure this is because they
have complete dependencies.
Does this mean also the Ninja build file has complete dependencies, because it
is also build by cmake?
If this is the case, then in connection with cmake and an existing ninja binary
make is not needed any more.
Peter
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
