The most common term I have seen is "Developer Source". This indicates that you are provided a copy of the source code upon purchase of the product but you are not allowed to redistribute it with or without modifications.
Sincerely, Anthony Eden > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:cms-list-admin@;cms-list.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kimsal > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Open Source vs. FREE - WAS RE: [cms-list] Are > there any .Asp or C# Open Source Content Mangement Systems > out there?.. <snip> The people behind the term 'open source' would disagree. Whether or not you consider it 'official' the thrust of 'open source' as a descriptive term is firmly behind things being 'free' as well as allowing 'access to source code'. I'm not saying I necessarily agree with it - personally I'd rather see the community come up with another catchy phrase that sginifies that source code is available with a product which is commercial in nature, yet not 'open source'. Any suggestions? Michael Kimsal http://www.logicreate.com (<-- not 'open source', but source comes with the package) :) -- http://cms-list.org/ trim your replies for good karma. -- http://cms-list.org/ trim your replies for good karma.