Hi Ron,
     I did consider that hull shape (or rudder) might provide the lift
required to counteract leeway, but was surprised the speaker didn't talk
about it. Good promoters don't leave questions unanswered.

     The Formula wing sail is very cool!  Can't wait to see what my
sailmaker will charge for that one!

Gary


On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Ron Casciato <rjcasci...@comcast.net>wrote:

>     Gary:
>
>
>
> If I saw the video correctly, from the force images, etc., the surface
> areas of the hull at speed are only about a quarter of the whole hull and
> on the rear quarter where he has a big rudder on each side.  If the surface
> area of the hull approximates a much smaller hull shape, like a dinghy,
> then the rudder should be enough to hold leeway to a controllable
> amount………..
>
>
>
> It’s the lift that our keels provide and I’m not sure he doesn’t have some
> step or other shape in the hull under the water that might do the same
> thing………….
>
>
>
> I’m ready to fill out a APHRF handicap sheet and send it in just to shake
> it up a bit………….
>
>
>
> So now check out the web site for Formula-marine.com and scroll down to
> their Omer One Sail………… There is an article in the British journal of
> Yachting Monthly , October 2013 issue that tests this “Wing Sail “ out on
> an Elan 37……….. They have a short video with some dramatic views of this
> rig set up.  Lots of good stuff going on out there…………..
>
> http://www.formulamarine.com/projects-2/projects-carbon/omer-wing-sail  The 
> rest of their web sdite is also very interesting………….
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Ron C.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] *On Behalf Of *Gary
> Russell
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 10, 2013 8:33 PM
> *To:* C&C List
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Flying lead keel
>
>
>
> Jake,
>
>      Agreed.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Jake Brodersen <captain_j...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> Gary,
>
>
>
> With this type of design, a centerboard or other type of structure would
> be needed to avoid excessive leeway,
>
>
>
> On you second point, I agree.  Stability will be vanishing as the bulb
> gets higher above the water.  It could certainly make for some interesting
> sailing.  Self righting might be an issue.
>
>
>
> Jake
>
>
>
> *From:* CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] *On Behalf Of *Gary
> Russell
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 10, 2013 8:28 PM
> *To:* C&C List
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Flying lead keel
>
>
>
> My first problem with this canting design is that a typical keel performs
> two functions; a counter-balance for the forces against the sail, and a
> lifting foil to generate lift to windward to counteract leeway.  I only see
> the counter-balance in this design.
>
>
>
> My second problem with this design is the fact that as heel increases, the
> effect of the keel weight gets less, unless you continuously adjust the
> cant angle to keep it just above the water.
>
>
>
> Am I missing something?  I'm not saying these are insurmountable problems,
> but I don't see them addressed in Speed Dream.
>
>
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Chuck S <cscheaf...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Hey Dwight,
> That's an amazing canting keel design.  Guess we have to wait and see if
> such ideas will sell in the future?
>
> Chuck
> *Resolute*
> 1990 C&C 34R
> Atlantic City, NJ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>
>


-- 
~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to