Mike, I have a pretty little 1986 33 II for sale that would make an excellent 
racing platform...hint, hint, hint....we can talk about delivering....
 

 


Richard
1985 C&C 36 CB, Ohio River, Mile 596;

Richard N. Bush 
2950 Breckenridge Lane, Suite Nine
Louisville, Kentucky 40220-1462 
502-584-7255

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Hoyt, Mike via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
To: kenheaton <kenhea...@gmail.com>; cnc-list <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Cc: Hoyt, Mike <mike.h...@impgroup.com>
Sent: Wed, Jul 29, 2015 2:57 pm
Subject: Re: Stus-List Looking for feedback please



Thanks Ken
 
For sale but not sold.  As a matter of fact racing on it in 2 hours ….
 
If Koobalibra sells then my racing gets a lot more expensive as we have to use 
my boat! 
 
Mike
Persistence
1987 Frers 33
Halifax, NS
 
 
 
 
From: Ken Heaton [mailto:kenhea...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:52 PM
To: cnc-list
Cc: Hoyt, Mike
Subject: Re: Stus-List Looking for feedback please
 

Mike neglected to mention the 115 he races on out of Halifax, NS is also for 
sale (but it is a long way from Florida).

 

Ken H.


 

On 29 July 2015 at 13:22, Hoyt, Mike via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
I will echo what John has asked.  What are you planning to do with the boat?

I have raced weekly on a C&C115 for the past 6 years and have sailed quite a 
bit and raced some on and against a 99 as well.  Of the four models I believe 
these are the most commonly raced

The C&C 115 sails extremely well to wind but likes to have a good sized crew to 
run it.  We like to have 11 bodies on board when we race to give adequate 
weight on rail and to get all the jobs done.  Both the 115 and 99 have 
oversized spinnaker and pole but the 115 requires dip pole gybes since it has a 
mast end and a guy end on the pole.  This requires a mast person as well as a 
foredeck person for gybes.  The 99 can do end for end or dip pole so requires 
one less body.  Last year in a race week 7 was an adequate crew size on a 99.

The rig on the 115 is quite large.  The main sheet is led to a winch on either 
coaming and is more work to run than that on the 99 which is I believe 6 or 8 
to one with ratcheting cam cleats.  The traveler on the 99 seems to work better 
than that on the 115 as well.  Much else is the same on the two models

The interiors of both the 99 and 115 are quite nice but the aft cabin in the 99 
is a bit more cramped although my wife and I have slept quite comfortably in 
the aft cabin on a 99 more than once.

If going offshore the 115 is a far bigger boat than the 99 but I cannot speak 
for the 110 or 121.

For rigging the loads and simplicity of the 99 are very nice.  Many of the 
adjustments such as backstay are not hydraulic and are well geared and easily 
adjusted.  By comparison the loads on the 115 are higher making it difficult to 
adjust outhaul, halyard etc while hard on the wind.

 If you want a 99 for racing the boat named "Rabbit" is for sale.  It is hull 
#1, has the original 6'6" keel, carbon rig, bow sprit, carbon wheel and custom 
Spartan interior.  This would be the fastest C&C99 in existence and there is a 
huge difference in performance between the 6.5 ft keel and the 5.5 version.  
Note that if you are concerned about going places because of a deep draft then 
forget the 115 which I believe is 7 ft and go for the 5.5 ft 99.

Both of the newer C&Cs that I have regularly sailed on and raced on are very 
nice designs and very nice sailing boats.  C&C IMO really dropped the ball when 
they changed to only the shallower keel on the 99 as it has affected the 
performance noticeably but is still a very well performing boat even with the 
5.5 ft keel.  The shallower keel has the weight a bit aft on the 99 compared to 
the 6.5 ft keel making it very important to get weight forward for optimum 
trim.  A Carbon rig 6.5 ft keel version here in Halifax is very fast and an 
Olson 30 that has raced against both variants of the 99 commented how much 
faster the deeper keel one was.

You are not going to do wrong with either the 99 or the 115 but if short handed 
sailing a lot the smaller 99 is easier to handle.  IMO C&C made 4 very lovely 
models in these boats.  Good luck with your search

Oh - and the cut out transoms on all models are something I am very envious 
about.  Swimming off the 99 is very convenient compared to climbing up the 
transom and over the pushpit on our Frers 33

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Bradford 
Baker via CnC-List
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 12:39 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Bradford Baker
Subject: Stus-List Looking for feedback please

My wife and I are considering a C & C 99, 110, 115 and 121.
Does anyone have any experiences, thoughts or opinions you’d care to share with 
us?

In Tampa Bay, where I'm thinking that “Mother Nature always bats last.”

Bradford W. Baker
bradba...@mac.com
8308 Old Town Drive
Tampa, FL 33647
813-528-3291



_______________________________________________

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com

_______________________________________________

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com


 



_______________________________________________

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com


 
_______________________________________________

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com

Reply via email to