I've been debating my bilge pump plan for a few months now, and having
trouble deciding. What have others here decided is sufficient pump
capacity?

I have two Rule 800s now and am considering upgrading one to an 1100 or
2000 gph, as a high water alarm. That will require upgrading the hose from
3/4" to 1 1/8", and enlarging the thruhull at the toerail. One of the bilge
hoses runs through the stbd head (into the head cubbies) and the other runs
through the hanging locker fwd of the head. Upgrading will require
enlarging some of the hose holes in the boat's liner (below the cabin sole)
probably, and of course hole sawing a larger thru hull. So it's a good deal
more work than just replacing bilge pumps, their wiring, and adding a float
switch + alarm.

>From Wally's page I know he installed a Rule 2000.
http://www.wbryant.com/StellaBoat/Projects/bilgepmp/bilgepmp.htm
However it sounds like Wally's LF38 had his hoses run differently - to the
stern quarter - while mine are to stbd mid-ships.

With two 800's I'm at the low end of the 1600-2000 gph capacity range
recommended by West Marine (and yes I've read all about how actual capacity
may be much lower, due to voltage drop, head pressure, etc). I've also
heard it doesn't make much sense to say that bigger boats need bigger bilge
pumps - a 20' boat will sink just as fast (or faster) with a 1.5" hole as a
38' one will.

I'm more concerned with having the capacity to prevent the boat from
sinking at dock if say a 1.5" thruhull disintegrated somehow. Less
concerned with emergency pumping while onboard, because I'm not going far
offshore and I have a lot of emergency hole plugging options to try (putty,
foam, wood bungs, carrots, etc).

-Patrick
1984 C&C Landfall 38
Seattle, WA
_______________________________________________

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!

Reply via email to