Only sailors tell these stories on themselves… John
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 9:38 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List > <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: > > While re-launching this year I accidentally left the depth transducer out. > It is a hole about 1.5 or 1.75 inches in diameter. The bilge pump started > almost immediately but since I was on deck I assumed that water had been > trapped and was now draining into the bilge. After about 30 seconds when the > pump didn't shutoff I looked below to see a geyser. I jumped down and > grabbed one of the wooden plugs which had conveniently floated into easy > reach. Water was at the bottom of the floorboards! I hoped up and asked the > travel lift operator to lift the boat up. Once the boat was clear of the > water I unplugged the hole. With the bilge pump running, and water free to > run out, it still took about 5 minutes to drain. > > Josh Muckley > S/V Sea Hawk > 1989 C&C 37+ > Solomons, MD > > On Apr 14, 2016 6:11 PM, "Patrick Davin via CnC-List" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com > <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote: > Interesting. That's basically what I was wondering. I was looking for a > calculator, but I found > this: http://www.whsyc.org/Flooding/Flooding.html > <http://www.whsyc.org/Flooding/Flooding.html> > > A 1.5" hole 2 feet below waterline results in 62.5 gpm (per minute!) = 3750 > gph. Even 4000 gph capacity wouldn't keep up with that, after accounting for > efficiency losses. > > So why do some people go for high bilge pump capacities? (like 2000-4000 gph > total) > > Sure it gives you a bit more time, but if I'm not at the boat it's probably > not going to make a difference (there's often no one on our dock for 12+ > hours between say 8pm and 8am), and if I am, it will only make a small > difference. (ex, the difference between 800+800gph vs 800+2000gph... > assuming 75% efficiency that's 1200gph vs 2100gph). > > So with that 1.5" hole I'd take on net water of ~42.5 gpm vs 25.8 gpm. So > whether 42 gallons per minute are coming in, or 25 gallons per minute, I > still need to plug it really friggin quickly. > > I do have the StaPlug btw, and Stay Afloat putty. > Just having a hard time imagining scenarios where an 800+2000 would make a > critical difference vs an 800+800, and wondering if this is just one of those > things where boaters are a bit paranoid and choosing the "bigger is better" > approach when that's not necessarily true. From what I can tell, *broken* > bilge pumps are the biggest issue (clogged, burnt out, bad wiring, etc). > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:22 PM, <cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com > <mailto:cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com>> wrote: > From: Josh Muckley <muckl...@gmail.com <mailto:muckl...@gmail.com>> > To: "C&C List" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> > Cc: > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:21:23 -0400 > Subject: Re: Stus-List Bilge pump capacity? > You'll have a shockingly hard time keeping up with a 1.5 inch hole no matter > what size bilge pump you have. Plugging the hole is always better. Its > gonna sink if the seacock disintegrates while you're not there. > > Josh Muckley > S/V Sea Hawk > 1989 C&C 37+ > Solomons, MD > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like > what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions > are greatly appreciated! > > _______________________________________________ > > This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like > what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions > are greatly appreciated!
_______________________________________________ This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
