The 33-2 seems  pretty bendy to me, (though I lack reference points) it is 
certainly smaller in section than many similar sized boats. 

Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 19, 2017, at 1:33 PM, <firewa...@reinardy.us> <firewa...@reinardy.us> 
> wrote:
> 
> Forgive my ignorance on this, but do your boats have a bendy mast?  My 30-2 
> has a baby stay with a 4:1 purchase, but I can't get much movement out of the 
> rig with it at all.  We use the Cunningham quite a bit, but the baby stay is 
> collecting dust.
> 
> Jim Reinardy 
> C&C 30-2 "Firewater"
> Milwaukee, WI
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Baby stay vs Cunningham?
> From: "Hoyt, Mike via CnC-List" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> Date: Fri, May 19, 2017 5:21 am
> To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> Cc: "Hoyt, Mike" <mike.h...@impgroup.com>
> 
> Josh
>  
> You are correct.  Baby stay is designed to help with mast pumping.  A side 
> effect may be that bending mast opens leech somewhat. Since babystay is 
> usually only used in windy conditions opening the leech is not such a bad 
> thing.
>  
> On fractionally rigged boats which most C&Cs and our Frers unfortunately are 
> not backstay is ALL ABOUT main sail and really opens leech.  Has much less 
> effect on forestay tension than on masthead boat. The C&C 115 was fractional 
> (more or less) and had a really bendy mast.  The main was very easily shaped 
> with all the controls.  Going to masthead rig on Frers after years of 
> trimming main on Niagara 26, J27 and C&C 115 made the main seem awkward and 
> clunky for quite some time.  It is a lot more work to trim it effectively 
> (IMO)
>  
> Back to our original point.  Opening or closing leech is a major tool in 
> trimming main sail.  A tight sheet and vang does close the leech but wind it 
> is usually bending mast that is a tool used to open leech vs in light wind
>  
> Mike
>  
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Josh 
> Muckley via CnC-List
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 4:39 PM
> To: C&C List
> Cc: Josh Muckley
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Baby stay vs Cunningham?
>  
> Mike I believe you are correct but isn't that simply a side effect?  Leech 
> tension and sail twist should be controlled by the mail sheet and vang.  In 
> fact I think the opening of the leech is experienced more with changes in 
> backstay tension as a result of changing the position of the masthead.
>  
> Correct me if I'm wrong but I think that your statement is metaphorically 
> equivalent to saying, "The backstay controls main sheet tension."  True the 
> backstay can affect main sheet tension, but that's not its purpose.  
> Likewise, bending the mast can open the leech but that's not its purpose and 
> the components designed to control the leech (vang and mainsheet) are still 
> available to "close" it.  Kind of a does the tail wag the dog situation.
>  
> Josh Muckley
> S/V Sea Hawk
> 1989 C&C 37+
> Solomons, MD
>  
>  
>  
> On May 18, 2017 9:00 AM, "Hoyt, Mike via CnC-List" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> 
> wrote:
> And bending mast would also open leech
>  
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Josh 
> Muckley via CnC-List
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:52 AM
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Cc: Josh Muckley
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Baby stay vs Cunningham?
>  
> Cunningham does flatten the sail but simply due to luff tension.
> If a baby stay is able to pull the belly of the mast forward then the luff is 
> also pulled forward and the resulting shape of the sail is flatter.
> Josh
>  
> On Thu, May 18, 2017, 8:18 AM Hoyt, Mike via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> 
> wrote:
> Doesn't the cunngham assist the halyard in moving draft forward?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Dave S via 
> CnC-List
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 10:43 PM
> To: C&c Stus List
> Cc: Dave S
> Subject: Stus-List Baby stay vs Cunningham?
> 
> Both depower the main....  Does the adjustable baby stay (mast bend) make the 
> Cunningham (luff tension) redundant?
> I have an adjustable baby stay, is adding a Cunningham a waste of time?
> 
> Thanks , Dave
> 33-2
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> 
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish 
> to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish 
> to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish 
> to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>  
> _______________________________________________
> 
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish 
> to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to: 
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
_______________________________________________

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!

Reply via email to