Page 68 of the manual pdf file which I linked before has the pre-load and
max load limits.

Again I am corrected in my preconceived notions regarding the correlation
between a hydraulic gauge and the tensile load on the back stay.

Josh

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 8:13 PM Gary Russell via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Hi Josh,
>      Where did you find the 4125 or 5000 lb. limit?  I don't see that in
> the Owners Manual?  Is the 4125 lb. limit for the lower angled segments of
> the the back stay or the upper vertical part.  You can't simply measure the
> port back stay tension and multiply by two, because of the angle between
> the two.  You would have to measure the angle and apply some trig to get
> the right value.  Mike Cotton's boat was the one I was referring to in my
> email above.
>
> Gary
>
> ~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>> The manual says limit to 4125lbs and then says absolute max of 5000lbs.
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8pEh5lnvP1ySXFBdDhrX0ZaMzNnazViYkZzRVRoODlSSUd3/view?usp=drivesdk
>>
>> I never considered that the hydraulic pressure psi could/would be
>> independent of tensile load.  When I had my hydraulic pump rebuilt by Lew
>> Townsend he tried to adjust the relief valve but mine adjustment knob was
>> seized.  He gave up and just hydro-tested it anyway.  He found that the
>> relief was roughly 3500.  I rarely go over 2500.  Now that I have to
>> consider the corollary between psi and lbs I'll be pulling out my Loose
>> tension gauge and get back to you.  Since it is split I'll remember to add
>> together or double a single.
>>
>> As for the attachment to the transom, I agree it does seem slightly poor
>> engineering.  In fact when we were shopping around the first boat looked at
>> wad named Blue Pearl and had been owned by Mike Cotton who was and may
>> still be on this list.  It was evident that some past event had caused the
>> port aft attachment to separate the flat horizontal (cap) part of the
>> fiberglass casting from the curved (body) potion.  The hydraulic pump was a
>> single piston and pump combo that attached between the port anchor amd the
>> port side of the back stay.  Evidently a sheave communicated the tension to
>> the stbd size at the point where the single rod attached from the mast
>> head.  It seemed as though maybe the sheave didn't roll smoothly and failed
>> to split the tension evenly between the port and stbd anchor on the
>> transom.  That of the fiberglass layup was uneven and the port side was
>> just coincidentally weaker.
>>
>> I was attentive to this weakness when I continued shopping and found Sea
>> Hawk.  I discussed the issue with the PO and he showed his engineering
>> answer.
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B8pEh5lnvP1ybDFIZ0ZZTU1XdHM
>>
>> I'm not convinced that it is "correct" but it is certainly better than
>> nothing.  I had decided years ago that I was going to engineer a
>> reinforcement of my own with some G10 FPR.  I still have the G10 but have
>> never acted on the project.  My idea was to back the entire corner of the
>> transom with 1/2" G10 FRP by epoxying it in place and then fill the
>> attachment cavity (the bump out) with epoxy.  Longer u-bolts and a spade or
>> mortise bit to countersink a flat load bearing "pad" for the washers and
>> nuts to drive against and I would be done.
>>
>> Josh Muckley
>> S/V Sea Hawk
>> 1989 C&C 37+
>> Solomons, MD
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 5:53 PM Gary Russell via CnC-List <
>> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>
>>>      Does anyone know the maximum back stay tension allowed on the C&C
>>> 37+.  My problem is the hydraulic back stay adjuster pressure gauge has
>>> failed and I don't even know what the maximum pressure spec allowed is,
>>> anyway.  I'm concerned that at least one owner has had the attachment
>>> points on the transom fail presumably due to excessive tension/pressure.
>>> Frankly, the attachment points don't instill a lot of confidence as there
>>> aren't any backing plate; just a couple of holes drilled in the hull.  I'd
>>> feel more comfortable putting a Loos gauge on the wire and calibrate the
>>> extension of the back stay adjuster to it.  Any thoughts / ideas out there?
>>>
>>> Live Slow / Sail Fast,
>>> Gary
>>> S/V Kaylarah
>>> '90 C&C 37+
>>> East Greenwich, RI, USA
>>> ~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
>>> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
>>> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
>> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
>> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to