Josh,
     Great!  I would be most interested in the displacement of the
hydraulic RAM vs. the Loos gauge tension, since I don't have a working
pressure gauge:

     What would be most interesting to me, would be a table like:

Pressure          Loos Gauge      Displacement of the RAM in inches
pounds             pounds             inches
0                       ???                    0"
500
1000
1500
2000
etc.

.  I don't actually have a Loos gauge, either, but am trying to borrow one.

Thanks,
Gary

~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~


On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> With that info I'll head down to my boat and apply various psi to the
> hydraulics and then measure the tension with my loos gauge.
>
> Josh
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 10:17 AM Gary Russell via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>> So...  I went over to Kaylarah this morning and found the following:
>>
>> The back stay diagonals are 235" long
>> The spread between the attachments is 80"
>> Doing the math, that means if the maximum tension on the vertical rod is
>> 5000 lbs., then the tension on the diagonals is 2537 lbs.
>> From here you can apply any safety factor you like, just maintain the
>> ration of 2537 : 5000.
>> Because the angle between the diagonals is so small (smaller than I
>> thought), it is pretty close to 2:1.
>>
>> Personally, I'm going to try and keep the tension on the diagonals less
>> than 2000 lbs. which keeps the upper rod below 3942 lbs.  (Now where did I
>> put that Loos gauge?)
>>
>> Gary
>> S/V Kaylarah
>> '90 C&C 37+
>> East Greenwich, RI, USA
>>
>>
>> ~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Gary Russell <captnga...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>      Actually, if you look closely at the manual, you will notice that
>>> the 4125 lbs. refers to "wire limit", and 5000 lbs. refers to "rod limit".
>>> Since the vertical part of the back stay assembly is rod, I will assume
>>> that the 5000 lbs. refers to the vertical.  I will go over to the boat
>>> tomorrow and try to measure the back stay angle, to see which limit gets
>>> exceeded first, the rod or the wire.  C&C could have made this a lot
>>> easier.  I've got to believe the transom will fail before the wire, yet the
>>> wire is all that is specified.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <
>>> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Absolutely without any doubt in my mind the backstay tension of 4125 is
>>>> to be measured on the mainline.  This works in opposition to the head stay
>>>> which is equally sized #12 rod.
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 8:41 PM Gary Russell via CnC-List <
>>>> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>>      Oops!  I missed that.  I looked in the chapter about rigging and
>>>>> didn't find it there.  Silly me!  I even searched for the number 4125 and
>>>>> found nothing.  I guess the document is an image rather than text. Now the
>>>>> question, is that the tension in the vertical part of the back stay?  I
>>>>> guess, the safest assumption is that it is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <
>>>>> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Page 68 of the manual pdf file which I linked before has the pre-load
>>>>>> and max load limits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again I am corrected in my preconceived notions regarding the
>>>>>> correlation between a hydraulic gauge and the tensile load on the back 
>>>>>> stay.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 8:13 PM Gary Russell via CnC-List <
>>>>>> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>>>>      Where did you find the 4125 or 5000 lb. limit?  I don't see
>>>>>>> that in the Owners Manual?  Is the 4125 lb. limit for the lower angled
>>>>>>> segments of the the back stay or the upper vertical part.  You can't 
>>>>>>> simply
>>>>>>> measure the port back stay tension and multiply by two, because of the
>>>>>>> angle between the two.  You would have to measure the angle and apply 
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>> trig to get the right value.  Mike Cotton's boat was the one I was
>>>>>>> referring to in my email above.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <
>>>>>>> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The manual says limit to 4125lbs and then says absolute max of
>>>>>>>> 5000lbs.  https://drive.google.com/file/d/
>>>>>>>> 0B8pEh5lnvP1ySXFBdDhrX0ZaMzNnazViYkZzRVRoODlSSUd3/view?usp=drivesdk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I never considered that the hydraulic pressure psi could/would be
>>>>>>>> independent of tensile load.  When I had my hydraulic pump rebuilt by 
>>>>>>>> Lew
>>>>>>>> Townsend he tried to adjust the relief valve but mine adjustment knob 
>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> seized.  He gave up and just hydro-tested it anyway.  He found that the
>>>>>>>> relief was roughly 3500.  I rarely go over 2500.  Now that I have to
>>>>>>>> consider the corollary between psi and lbs I'll be pulling out my Loose
>>>>>>>> tension gauge and get back to you.  Since it is split I'll remember to 
>>>>>>>> add
>>>>>>>> together or double a single.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As for the attachment to the transom, I agree it does seem slightly
>>>>>>>> poor engineering.  In fact when we were shopping around the first boat
>>>>>>>> looked at wad named Blue Pearl and had been owned by Mike Cotton who 
>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> and may still be on this list.  It was evident that some past event had
>>>>>>>> caused the port aft attachment to separate the flat horizontal (cap) 
>>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>>> of the fiberglass casting from the curved (body) potion.  The hydraulic
>>>>>>>> pump was a single piston and pump combo that attached between the port
>>>>>>>> anchor amd the port side of the back stay.  Evidently a sheave 
>>>>>>>> communicated
>>>>>>>> the tension to the stbd size at the point where the single rod attached
>>>>>>>> from the mast head.  It seemed as though maybe the sheave didn't roll
>>>>>>>> smoothly and failed to split the tension evenly between the port and 
>>>>>>>> stbd
>>>>>>>> anchor on the transom.  That of the fiberglass layup was uneven and the
>>>>>>>> port side was just coincidentally weaker.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was attentive to this weakness when I continued shopping and
>>>>>>>> found Sea Hawk.  I discussed the issue with the PO and he showed his
>>>>>>>> engineering answer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B8pEh5lnvP1ybDFIZ0ZZTU1XdHM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not convinced that it is "correct" but it is certainly better
>>>>>>>> than nothing.  I had decided years ago that I was going to engineer a
>>>>>>>> reinforcement of my own with some G10 FPR.  I still have the G10 but 
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> never acted on the project.  My idea was to back the entire corner of 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> transom with 1/2" G10 FRP by epoxying it in place and then fill the
>>>>>>>> attachment cavity (the bump out) with epoxy.  Longer u-bolts and a 
>>>>>>>> spade or
>>>>>>>> mortise bit to countersink a flat load bearing "pad" for the washers 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> nuts to drive against and I would be done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh Muckley
>>>>>>>> S/V Sea Hawk
>>>>>>>> 1989 C&C 37+
>>>>>>>> Solomons, MD
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 5:53 PM Gary Russell via CnC-List <
>>>>>>>> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      Does anyone know the maximum back stay tension allowed on the
>>>>>>>>> C&C 37+.  My problem is the hydraulic back stay adjuster pressure 
>>>>>>>>> gauge has
>>>>>>>>> failed and I don't even know what the maximum pressure spec allowed 
>>>>>>>>> is,
>>>>>>>>> anyway.  I'm concerned that at least one owner has had the attachment
>>>>>>>>> points on the transom fail presumably due to excessive 
>>>>>>>>> tension/pressure.
>>>>>>>>> Frankly, the attachment points don't instill a lot of confidence as 
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>> aren't any backing plate; just a couple of holes drilled in the hull. 
>>>>>>>>>  I'd
>>>>>>>>> feel more comfortable putting a Loos gauge on the wire and calibrate 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> extension of the back stay adjuster to it.  Any thoughts / ideas out 
>>>>>>>>> there?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Live Slow / Sail Fast,
>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>> S/V Kaylarah
>>>>>>>>> '90 C&C 37+
>>>>>>>>> East Greenwich, RI, USA
>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.
>>>>>>>>> Each and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support 
>>>>>>>>> the list
>>>>>>>>> - use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/
>>>>>>>>> stumurray
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.
>>>>>>>> Each and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the 
>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>> - use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/
>>>>>>>> stumurray
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.
>>>>>>> Each and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the 
>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>> - use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/
>>>>>>> stumurray
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.
>>>>>> Each and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the 
>>>>>> list
>>>>>> - use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/
>>>>>> stumurray
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.
>>>>> Each and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the 
>>>>> list
>>>>> - use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
>>>> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
>>>> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
>> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
>> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
>
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to