>From everything I have seen, the Beta Marine engines are a great option. One of the biggest problems with engine replacement is getting the bedding correct. Beta addresses this by designing mounts that are designed to be like for like with popular counterparts such as Yanmar and Universal. From what I recall the price is about half that of a Yanmar and without the cost of a re-bed the Beta is very competitively priced. I have a 30Hp Yanmar 3HM35F in my 37+ (40 ft) and often feel like it might be a little anemic. I would avoid turbo charged versions if at all possible.
As for a feathering prop I have one (Max Prop). I like the engineering but if doing the annual maintenance is something you would rather avoid then a fixed prop might be a better choice. A fixed pitch prop requires a transmission that can freewheel/waterwheel or has a shaft break. Check with each manufacturer. The nice thing about the max prop or similar is that if you find that the boat is over pitched or under pitched you can adjust (not on the fly). The new max props can be adjusted by a diver in the water, older style require a haul out. Josh Muckley S/V Sea Hawk 1989 C&C 37+ Solomons, MD On Fri, Jun 26, 2020, 07:48 David Risch via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: > Repowered my old Bristol with a Beta. Kubota based engine with parts > available all over the world inexpensively and was designed to be serviced > easily (e.g. built in oil pump). Great engine and great service by Beta. > Go with 38. Can upgrade your alternator and extra torque in a sloppy sea > when you need it. You will love a feathering prop. > > > > *David F. Risch* > > *(401) 419-4650* > > > > *From:* CnC-List <cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com> *On Behalf Of *Gary > Niemi via CnC-List > *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2020 7:55 PM > *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com > *Cc:* Gary Niemi <g...@niemi.co.nz> > *Subject:* Stus-List Re-power and prop for 1981 C&C Landfall 38 > > > > We are American expatriates who have sailed our 1981 C&C Landfall 38 to > New Zealand a decade ago. It has a Perkins 4-108, which is on its last > legs. It's not particularly reliable and is having trouble with overheating > in the last few years. Also, it's very heavy and it is way too much power > anyway. We're looking to replace it with a more reliable, modern power > plant. > > > > So we have a couple of questions: > > > > What is the correct power? I understand most were sold with Yanmer 30hp > 3HM or 3QM diesels. We like the idea of saving a lot of weight with a > smaller engine than the Perkins, as well as ease of access, etc. However, > we'd consider a 35 or 38 also if 30 horsepower wasn't enough power. > > > > At the same time we'll be replacing the fixed 2 blade prop with a 3 blade > feathering or folding prop, so will be looking for recommendations for > that. The current prop is totally wrong. I think it's 16x14. We never > were able to get up to the proper engine speed with the 4-108. Can you > recommend something? What have people tried? > > > > Interested in hearing others' experiences. > > > > Gary Niemi > g...@niemi.co.nz > _______________________________________________ > > Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each > and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - > use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray > >
_______________________________________________ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray