On Mar 25, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Robert Lazzurs <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 16:40, Rainer Duffner <rai...@ultra- > secure.de> wrote: >> Michael DeHaan schrieb: >>> >>> We don't really have a vested interest in making Windows physical >>> deployments easy to deploy. >>> > > Hello, > > So just to add my 2c in... > > This statement worries me, I would suggest while we as a community > should encourage the use of FOSS operating systems do we really want > to take an RMS style view on this? Cobbler from my POV should be a > generic systems management and will work best if it can document and > deploy your whole infrastructure, re my earlier comments about > upgrading iLO cards and network devices from Cobbler. > > Windows is not going to be going away from the data centre any time > soon and while I believe everything should be virtual unless there is > a good reason not to be not everyone has that view. > This is pretty much how I feel about it, but again I'm biased :) >>> This list becoming 1/2 about Windows questions would not be good >>> -- and >>> it distracts us from the core mission. >>> >> >> Indeed. >> Supporting Windows just sucks too many resources. > > Would these support requests not be balanced out by an increased > number of Windows users on the list? > > Again just my thoughts, if the community wants to provide and support > Windows deployment on tin then why not allow it? > > Take care. My thought regarding this would be to spin off a new list if it ever got that bad. > > _______________________________________________ > cobbler mailing list > [email protected] > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
