>>> In that case, it would also be beneficial to remove the * >> >> I find the asterisk required here > > Yu can do whatever you want, but you will get lotsof false positives if > you keep it. If you really want a star on the declaration
I would prefer to use a minus character for the specification that an unused value should be deleted if corresponding change confidence can be achieved for the discussed source code analysis pattern also by the means of the semantic patch language. > then you need to make two rules. The first that finds the positions of the > places > that match and the second that only puts a * when there is both a matched > declaration and a matched reinitialization. But I wold imagine that from > the reinitialization, it would be easy to find the declaration, so it > doesn't seem worth further complicating the rule. This explanation sounds promising. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
