> On Jun 14, 2016, at 20:51, Quincey Morris
> <quinceymor...@rivergatesoftware.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I prefer to use the other form for setters, too. I don’t see why:
>
> self.animal = YES;
>
> is any improvement over:
>
> self.isAnimal = YES;
>
> even when it’s something less concrete, say:
>
> self.enabled = YES;
>
> vs:
>
> self.isEnabled = YES;
>
> As far as I’m concerned, if the “is…” or “has…” form is better for getters,
> it’s better for setters too. (But it doesn’t seem like a religious matter.)
Why are you using a getter as a setter?
If(!self.isEnabled)
self.enabled = YES;
Or:
If(![self isEnabled])
[self setEnabled:YES];
Steve via iPad
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
