On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:54 PM, Kyle Sluder <k...@ksluder.com> wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:02 PM, Jens Alfke <j...@mooseyard.com> wrote: > >> >> But then, I haven't tried sandboxing yet. It sounds almost like some >> exquisite form of BDSM: taking away all of your freedom and then making you >> beg to get little bits back. Does it come with safe-words? > > Irrespective of everything else, this is indeed the model for sandboxing. > Because "you" is not normally synonymous with "the user", and the industry > has awoken to the reality that the user can not trust your motives to be > pure. Because in the face of a successful attack, "you" might not be the > author of the executing code either. Ah, that explains why all of Apple's apps are sandboxed Riiiiight. __jayson _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
