On Jun 10, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Quincey Morris <quinceymor...@rivergatesoftware.com> wrote:
> It's quite possible that the image files are being mapped into memory, rather > than being read into allocated buffers. That would produce the results you've > described (an increase in VM usage, but no big allocation footprint). I don’t think r/o memory-mapped address space shows up under RPRVT. (It’s not ‘private’ — any other process that mmap’ed the same file would be sharing that address space.) —Jens _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
